Editorial Review Product Description New York Times bestselling author Vonda N. McIntyre proves she is "blessed with both vision and genius" (BookPage) in this breathtaking tale -- part adventure story, part legend, and part Gothic novel-- what Publishers Weekly calls "a marvelous alternative history fable." In seventeenth-century France, Louis XIV rules with flamboyant ambition. From the Hall of Mirrors to the vermin-infested attics of the Chateau at Versailles, courtiers compete to please the king, sacrificing fortune, principles, and even the sacred bond between brother and sister. Marie-Josèphe de la Croix looks forward to assisting her adored brother in the scientific study of the rare sea monsters the king has commissioned him to seek. For the honor of his God, his country, and his king, Father Yves de la Croix returns with his treasures, believed to be the source of immortality: one heavy shroud packed in ice...and a covered basin that imprisons a shrieking creature. The living sea monster, with its double tail, tangled hair, and gargoyle face, provides an intriguing experiment for Yves and the king. Yet for Marie-Josèphe, the creature's gaze and exquisite singing foretell a different future.... Soon Marie-Josèphe is contemplating choices that defy the institutions which power her world. Somehow, she must find the courage to follow her heart and her convictions -- even at the cost of changing her life forever. A sensitive investigation of the integrity in all of us, The Moon and the Sun is destined to become a visionary classic.Amazon.com Review In this rich and engrossing tale, Vonda N. McIntyre proves once again thather plotting and mastery of language are among the best in the business.The Moon and the Sun, which won the 1997NebulaAward forbest novel of the year, is the story of Marie-Josèphe, a young lady in thecourt of Louis XIV. When her brother Yves returns from a naturalist voyagewith two sea monsters (one live, one dead), Marie-Josèphe is caught up in abattle of wills involving the fate of the living creature. The king intendsto test whether the sea monster holds the secrets of immortality, butMarie-Josèphe knows the creature to be an intelligent, lonely being whoyearns only to be set free. In a monumental test of the limits of patienceand love, Marie-Josèphe defies the will of the king, her brother, and thepope in defense of what she knows is right, at any cost.McIntyre'satmospheric prose envelops the reader in a fully realized world--sights,smells, and sounds are described in great detail. The authorcompletely represents the Sun King's court atVersailles--her research for the book must have been quite extensive. The blend ofhistory, science, and fantasy makes for a book you will want to gulp down.--Therese Littleton ... Read more Customer Reviews (45)
Slow....and historically naive
Like so many other readers I bougth the book because of its winning of a Nebula Award. And I am wondering like many other reviewers how it ever could win such a prestigious award - my only explanation is that back in the 90s people didn't expect much of alternate history novels... while nowadays (2010) our tastes for fantasy are more refined due to the large amount of very good books being published in the last years.
The story moves very very slowly, it is utterly predictable, the heroine is too perfect to be true or even engaging, the novel often has a very educational tone and the depiction of the historical setting is quite naive.
In detail: The story is slow because of the very long descriptions of boring court events like evening gatherings. Some people migth think that interesting because it tells something about the life at Louis XIV's court, but trust me (I am a historian) the descriptions are totally unoriginal and I have read them better done in other novels. The descriptions of historical facts and surroundings often feel like copied out of history books or guide books even.
The story feels slow, too, because it is so very predictable. From chapter 1 it is clear who the heroine's love interest will be and who will be the bad guy for whom she falls first. The "big surprise" regarding the sea monster can be guessed by the reader from the first time on it is described as "singing". Conflicts with the king are programmed from the beginning.
The heroine, 20-year-old Marie-Josephe, has incredibly many special interests and abilities which are all in due course acknowledged by the king and so she is asked to draw, to compose, to ... for him. She is a stunning beauty and totally virtuous. Which is utterly annoying to the reader. She was brought up in a very strict convent and shows all signs of Victorian innocence regarding sex which is shown to an extreme throughout the story. Very early it becomes clear that the reader will follow her sexual awakening - the dichotomy between catholic prudeness and modern sexual liberation ring constantly in your mind - what a lame pretext for character development. Marie-Josephe's naivité feels very unfitting to her so admired intelligence - surely she could do better to understand certain words and motives around her. Very frustrating to the reader to see her in yet another awkward position just because of her naivite.
Sadly, many people who are not very well read in history believe that the Victorian attitude towards all things sexual have been characteristic to the Catholic church since "dark medieval times". This is wrong. Sadly, it is still perpetuated by writers of historical fiction who don't know enough about the epochs they are writing about.
This is one of the examples which make the very educational tone of the novel. Each time something historical is told it feels not "normal" but like the author is showing off her research for the benefit and education of the reader. When she described places or art work in Versailles it feels like she took notes during tourist's tour and copies them into the novel. They are utterly predictable because they are the most famous parts of the castle or the ones everybody reads about: e.g. the mentioned paintings or busts, the horrible living quarters in the attic, the fact that many nobles saved money by using up Versailles' candles.
Concerning the Count's stature: yes, it is not really mentioned in the first chapter that he is a dwarf, only hinted at - but I think we have to give McIntyre credit for doing this on purpose. I think she wants to put a minority into its right, showing that short people are more than their stature and can be valid love interests. The educational hint seems to me that it's about character not disability.
Speak about educational.
I believe that was somewhat daring and new anno 1997 (Nebula Award) but 13 years later this reads a bit forced.
In addition to the examples for very poor knowledge about the historic setting I think the description of the historical characters very naive. Louis XIV the benevolent family man? His frolicking young grandsons racing their ponies at an official court function? Marie-Josephe the attendant of the king's niece in the first row of courtiers? Dancing with the king? The overall depicted "happy family life" of all these historical characters including their emotional attachement towards each other ring to me like American ideals extended. People in the 17th century did not think like us and feel like us 20th century born.
Another point of annoyance for me was the so very positive description of sexual activities. Well, in the 17th century STD (Syphilis!) were a known fact and with all the fornication going on McIntyre could have hinted at that at least. It seems all the illegitimate offspring is well provided for so this important problem isn't faced either. It seems like the author is pressing the historical attitudes towards sex into post-contraception-pill free love ideals to make her goal of "loosing up" the heroine work.
As you can see the book annoyed me a lot.
So, why is it worth reading, nevertheless?
The sea-monster. The humour. I have to grant the book that many dialogues are funny. The development of Count Lucien as Marie-Josephe's love interest. If you are not a historian or well-read in historical fiction the historical flaws might not bother you. I enjoyed the language, too.
I think I will give another book by McIntyre a try - which has no historical setting. I suppose that might by much better.
Weak
Nebula-winner. Reading this book the setup suggested parallels to two other books, which made this one appear quite unfavorable by contrast. The first was Kit Whitfield's In Great Waters, with the mutual focus on a sapient underwater species in a historical backdrop. However where Whitfield created a complex and interesting species whose presence changed the whole pattern of history, McIntyre makes an idealized perfect sea-person, using it's almost saintly attitudes as a way to shine unfavorable light on humanity. The other book I was reminded of was McIntyre's Hugo-winning Snakedance, with its compelling exploration of gender, femininity, and its restriction. Here, that takes a far more basic approach, outlining ways the France of Louis XIV restricted women and made for an exploitative environment. The point is well served but ultimately the analysis is pretty obvious, and there's not enough character complexity to support a more ambitious reading. Beyond the parallels The Moon and the Sun is ultimately a weak book because it feels too slow. It's padded, the plot spends too long bouncing off the obvious potential outcomes and the level of intrigue produced in the story is ultimately too little spread over too long. This book definitely shouldn't have won any major awards.
Worse than: The Orphan's Tale by Cathereynne Valente
Better than: Whre Late the Sweet Bird Sang by Kate Wilhelm
Not your typical science fiction
I picked up this book in my quest to read the whole list of Nebula Award winning novels. Imagine my surprise when I opened it, read the first few pages, and discovered the book takes place hundreds of years ago, on Earth! "The Moon and the Sun" is more of a historical fiction novel with a science fiction twist (in the sea woman) than what might traditionally be considered science fiction.
That said, I was taken in by the richness of the story. McIntyre's writing took me to a time and place to which I had never given much thought before. The story gives an interesting look at the state of science at the time, when bleeding was still considered an acceptable medical practice, and microscopes were a new invention.
I highly recommend this book overall. It's a good window back in time, with a few fantastical elements to create an engaging story.
le Leviathan
This is a viable work of historical fiction with a fairly unique fantasy twist, but this book's social statements are forced and its themes are predictable. Vonda McIntyre put together a very robust historical setting in 17th Century France and the court of Louis XIV, which reflects an impressive amount of research. In the story, a mermaid-like sea monster has been captured and old Louis demands its dissection in the belief that the sea monster has an internal organ that bestows immortality. The heroine Marie-Josephe just happens to be the only person involved who cares about the sea monster and realizes its humanity and personality, thus reflecting her own struggles to get ahead in her oppressive society.
The allegory here is obviously the stifling etiquette, religious irrationality, class hatred, and vicious sexism that infected French society at the time, all of which oppressed the type of free-thinking and progressive young woman represented by Marie-Josephe. But the reader can figure this out very early on, making McIntyre's slow-moving social commentary about Marie-Josephe's awakening extremely predictable. Most of the book functions as a basic romance in which every character except Marie-Josephe narrowly reflects historical archetypes; and there are also far too many characters that add little to the basic plotline, as can be seen in the two-page list of characters at the front of the book. The whole thing develops very slowly, with non-typical plot elements regarding the sea monster's humanity and Marie-Josephe's efforts to save it not appearing until well after page 200. This book is pretty well-written and its historical backdrop is fully researched. It could be a plausible historical romance OR an intriguing work of sci-fi/fantasy. But unfortunately a successful combination of the two just doesn't come together. [~doomsdayer520~]
Good Book, Not Great (3 1/2 Stars)
I read this novel for free on the author's website, where it is now posted. The fact that this was a free book no doubt makes me look more kindly towards it. I think it's wonderful -- for something I didn't pay for. If I had spent my hard earned money on it, I would probably be a bit peeved.
This is an historical novel with an element of fantasy mixed in. And there is nothing wrong with that. Martha Wells does the same in her Ile-Rien series to great effect. The problem here is that there is too little of the fantastical until the very end. Personally, I happen to like historical novels as well as SF/F, so I wasn't put out by the imbalance, but straight SF/F readers might be.
After reading other reviews here, I'm surprised to find that some thought Marie-Josephe was painted as a paragon of virtue, as perfect, as a 17th century Pollyanna. I didn't find her to be so at all. She had flaws: she carried a lot of resentment towards the nuns in the covent she was confined to without ever realizing that they were just as constrained from speaking and acting as they liked as she was. She had no sense of charity towards them. She also still had anger towards her older brother, Yves, for sending her to the convent. She never really confronted him about it because he was her only relative and she didn't want to alienate him. So, she was being self-protective, not forgiving.
As for her accomplishments in study, I don't think them unusual. A young woman of genteel family would have been trained in all of the subjects she was good in. Marie-Josephe simply went farther than most girls because she had an older brother who was serious about study too and didn't prevent her from learning.
We have a lot of time-savers in modern life, but we have a lot of time-wasters too. This was a world without movies, radio, television. We'd proabably be all be polymaths if we learned to turn the TV off.
Marie-Josephe was on a small island away from "society" with no real playmates. What else would she have had to do for her free time except read?
I also don't see her as a proto-feminist. As one conversation with Count Lucien showed, her views towards women in relation to men were quite in line with the thinking of the times. And her interests were carried along in the plot because one man or another championed her various causes. It isn't until the end that she acted on her own.
I do agree with the reviewers who said the author was a little too eager to show off the fruits of her extensive research of 17th century France. Enough with the wig descriptions already -- we get it! I also agree with the one reviewer who opined that Madame should have been given a larger role in the book -- or had an entire book devoted to her.
All in all, I don't think this book deserved to win the Nebula. But, we all know that sometimes awards don't always go to the most deserving parties. I mean, Marisa Tomei and Mira Sorvino both have Oscars, for goodness sake! Still, it's a good read, overall. Despite its shortcomings, the book was never boring to me.
... Read more
|