Editorial Review Product Description Shosha is a hauntingly lyrical love story set in Jewish Warsaw on the eve of its annihilation. Aaron Greidinger, an aspiring Yiddish writer and the son of a distinguished Hasidic rabbi, struggles to be true to his art when faced with the chance at riches and a passport to America.But as he and the rest of the Writers' Club wait in horror for Nazi Germany to invade Poland, Aaron rediscovers Shosha, his childhood love-still living on Krochmalna Street, still mysteriously childlike herself-who has been waiting for him all these years. ... Read more Customer Reviews (15)
Powerful and tragic
I had read almost all of Singer but never this one. In his many chronicles of the Jews of Old Poland, Singer has brought all their pungent energies to life - the dedication to Torah study and observance, along with superstition, magic, demons, angels, food, love, sex, marital infidelity, even a fascination with communism. But he has mostly stayed away from the reality which ended that rich world; the Holocaust. Shosha is different. For the first time Singer wraps his narrative around the certainty that Hitler will invade Poland and destroy these people. Their various reactions - fatalism, Messianism, denial - are realistic and terribly sad. There is no theme of resistance; the Jews of Poland perceived little control over their destiny. The near suicidal depression of many of the characters is deeply upsetting to read. It was not until the founding of Israel that Jewish energy turned from helplessness to an assertive struggle for life. Singer was clearly swept up in this real life drama as he wrote Shosha, to the point of losing or purposely letting drift the plot thread as personal lives are taken over by a global tragedy.
The thread of the story is the narrator's love and devotion to the mentally challenged girl Shosha, to the point of marrying and protecting her and giving up his dissolute love affairs with sophisticated women. Indeed the author is twice offered escape to a safe America and twice rejects it in order to care for Shosha. The mystery throughout the book is why the protagonist does this; otherwise he is a very selfish man. My reading is that this love story is Singer's personal response to the Holocaust. The girl Shosha stands for Singer's bond with the Jewish people in their innocence and inability to defend themselves. Here is a man who no longer believes in G-d but nevertheless sacrifices himself to protect this innocence and purity, to make a gesture. It is a very moving story. It ends with an epilogue in Israel, with yet another kind of crazy life, but a new pride. Singer's final word: We are still waiting for the answers.
This book was published in the year Singer won the Nobel Prize and shows why his work will long be remembered.
A great book; Singer is a great authors
I've read most of Singer's literature and would rate this book towards the top of my list.I do feel that the theme of his novels has a similar tone.Personally, I think that Singer is one of the better authors out there.I would recommend someone reading Enemies, a Love Story if you enjoyed this book.
want to know about a great book?
Shosha is a great book by one of the leading authors of the 20th century. It is a beutiful love story with a difference.
The Excitement of "Shosha"
The main character, Aaron Greidinger, is a writer, an intellectual, interested in a simple girl, Shosha Schuldiener, from his childhood.He's interested in many women--sexually, too--which occasions wonder how Hasidic or Orthodox Jews can admire the author."You'll give her a few weeks of happiness, and then you'll abandon her", says girlfriend Betty Slomin about Aaron's interest in Shosha (84).This appeared accurate at that juncture.Look at the list.He has been having a long affair with the Communist Dora, a heavy woman.He has been sexually active with Celia, the wife of his friend Haiml and the girlfriend of Morris Feitelzohn.He is sexual and going around with Betty Slomin, the wife of Sam Dreiman, as she helps him with his playwriting.He is also making sexual advances toward the maid for his apartment, Tekla.And while all of this is transpiring, he is considering taking up again with his childhood girlfriend, Shosha.Singer's story, written in the late 1970s, is about a writer coping with sexual desires while writing a play.Singer probably designed this aspect of his character more for amusement than for reflecting any actual persons, including himself.
Greidinger moved from his childhood home to a second home during his adolescence to areas away from there, circling in and around Warsaw and the Yiddish writers around Warsaw.For 60 pages we watch a religious youth evolve into a secular writer and member of the Jewish intelligentsia, all without any help from the simple girl-woman Shosha.It's as difficult for us as it is for Betty Slomin, the wife of that affluent American, to fathom how he will develop a passion--and a commitment to--one woman at all, much less one simple, basic-looking woman, the woman for whom this whole novel is named.Subsequently, we find that he did, somehow.Somehow we are to believe that.He directly, artlessly informs her of his devotion.It is an aloof devotion for, despite all the exploratory discussion by this novelists' various intellectual characters, this character of his, this prominent writer, cannot ever seem to reach words to tell Shosha what it is he admires about her, what are her attractive qualities.
In fact, the writer remains as aloof toward her as he is toward the central questions vexing the people of his time.He appears more like a moderator in the intellectual discourse of his social milieu, and somewhat less than a concerned participant.
Aaron Greidinger, laconic, is mostly a neutral presence to the people about him, whom he, in fact, makes speak, for Greidinger is clearly just the author Singer, at an earlier time.So, Singer himself is neutral, for example, during the Dr. Feitelzohn and Mark Elbinger discussion of theology (142-145) when Greidinger says "I was not in the mood to take part in any discussions and I went over to the window."He is making the conversants there speak, and speak volumes, while he appears to not even move his lips, a silent listener, a ventriloquist.This subtle presence by the author characterizes almost the whole novel.In perhaps no other first-person narrated novel is the writer present as an indifferent listener, writing the dialogue of the other characters through an apparent ventriloquism.
The other characters are no dummies."Strangely, Morris Feitelzohn could speak with ardor about the wisdom found in certain Cabbalist and Hasidic books.In his own fashion, he loved the pious Jew and admired his faith and power to resist temptation. He once said to me, `I love the Jews even though I cannot stand them.No evolution could have created them.For me they are the only proof of Gd's existence.'" (19)But Singer is not sure how and whether to accept them; he is more fascinated with them and performing the obligation of recording them for posterity.
Feitelzohn possesses his two opposite sentiments regarding the Jews as if they are the only group about whom he could feel this way.Well, didn't he ever hear of the Amish, the Protestant American evangelists, even the devout Moslem?On the basis of irony, any of those could be proof that Gd exists, no?Perhaps his statement is about him, for he could be read as saying, "For me, they are the only proof of Gd's existence", which renders his statement a little trivial.
Aaron Greidinger's play is not respected by the theatre cast and crew.In the hands of producer Sam Dreiman, an American businessman, and his self-preoccupied girlfriend Betty Slonim, with her constant remarks and criticisms, it is subjected to constant revisions, as well as additions by various performers, and then additions by the actors union demanding more performers, and then by the theatre owner himself.(Ch. 6)
The story of the production reminds Greidinger of the tale of a village taken possession by madness, in which roles have been switched.An idiot is released from an institution and rendered a university professor, and the university's professors are floor sweepers, and so forth (112).
Social critics in the Jewish newspapers during the runup to the Hitler invasion of Poland reject any play other than plays providing reflection on the crisis, as distractions.What, they asked, does a medieval girl, the main character in the play, "The Ludmir Maiden", doubly possessed, by the dybbuks of a whore and a musician, have in relation to contemporary problems?
The play is examined in a rehearsal, resulting in rejection by its own producer, who calls it a "crazy farce for insane cabbalists".He doesn't realize that the farce quality resulted from all the kaleidoscopic alterations contributed by the various performers, his own girlfriend, and he himself.
Greidinger follows up this explanation with a retraction.(Ch. 7, Sect. I) It is he who is to blame for the play's failure.He could have worked on it.He does not suggest how he could have coped with all the revisions others made.It is not an intimate revelation of his inner intentions, which Jesus and his followers might seek from repentants.He admits to committing sins of lethargy and distraction, without more.He has failed to carry out the mitvah of writing a play, as if it had been assigned to him by the Jewish Gd, and describing what he was doing all those months instead is all that seems necessary to him to tell the story.Instead of "working on the play", he did this and that.He went with Betty Slonim to museums and to "silly American movies", from which there was nothing to learn.He spent his free time with Shosha, and falling onto the bed with Tekla.But whether he could have done anything to counter the willful interference of all those who were determined to leave their imprimatur on "The Maiden of Ludmir" is, he feels, not worth addressing.He doesn't even let us readers know what he would have done, although he strenuously argues he would have done it.This disingenuous list of his sins in an afterword is politic and deferential, to make him appear humble, likeable.We enjoy the description of his distractions.We like someone who owns up to his responsibilities.But if we think about it, he isn't credible.
Singer supposes it's his attitude that we readers will remember, his appearance of humility, as we skim lightly over his expression of regret. After all, the soul is not its specific memories.So, why should we readers remember these specificities?In speaking about the soul, as distinct from the mortal body, Dr. Feitelzohn notes that if memories of lives are washed away, on the one hand, the soul that survives is not "the same", with which his conversant concurs, which, like much else in Judaic theology, is essentialist philosophy.(144) The question is posed, in the effort to reach an answer, What essence survives paring away of the memories?(It must be noted that the difficulties to this line of inquiry consist of its terminology.)
If the philosophy in "Shosha" is vague, the characters are crystal clear.As the characters are founded on real personas known to Singer, readers always know who is talking, even without attributions, because of their immensely different positions in his world.Thus, while Greidinger has several women friends, one is the wife of a playwright and highly critical and intellectual about art, the second is a Communist deeply immersed in political ideology and cynicism (Dora), one is so simple she was kicked out of elementary school (Shosha), and another is a Gentile Polish housemaid bent on politeness, gratitude for the zlotys, and emotional support.Singer's own Greidinger main-character writer is subdued.Few inner psychological elaborations to him mean he's also known by his words and actions; we wonder as much about the man thinking and speaking in all scenes as about his colleagues.There's no chance of confusing him with the writers, like Feitelzohn, in his commnunity.If Feitelzohn is mystical, Greidinger is straightly secular.If Dora is ideological, Greidinger is cynical and convinced that no political system will work and all is doomed.Hence, great drama attends any meeting of minds.Readers are at the edges of their seats attentive to what the one would say and how the other would reply.Their actions and wordsare logical deductions from the essential characters their creator gave them.What are they doing together in one room? is the question that the dialogue is designed to answer.Thus, a vigorous minded Greidinger is often befriending then marrying/consoling a simple, forgetful, inept, innocent Shosha.Thus, the quiet, economizing, humble Greidinger is often befriending Betty Slonim, loud, assertive, boastful, explicative, and self-absorbed.Perhaps relationships based on discrepancies so great are possible only in art, a three-dimensional art that obtains a reality all its own.
Singer is content to present his outstanding characters in an exciting plot.A resolution to the tension of the plot is not necessary to him, apparently.Either that or he was just not "in the mood" to writing its resolution.Emigration from Poland to escape the threatening German war machine is an underlying theme throughout the earlier part of the novel, and emerges later in the foreground when Aaron Greidinger's play fails. The participants and observers of the play excitedly discuss the political situation there.The narrative has proceeded linearly.The reader expects the main characters to change their minds and organize an escape.However, the narrative suddenly leaps ahead in a giant leap . . . to flashback, as an epilogue (262), and the narrative is looking back from over a decade after, leaving the reader to wonder why there was all that dramatic tension in the first place.It is perhaps this disappointment of a drama unfulfilled that scuttles the entire enlightening and artistically original novel to the dark corners of our bookshelves and has precluded it from university course readings on European literature.
One of Singer's Best
Singer writes an odd and completely compelling love story. I read this book every couple of years and always find it fresh and interesting. It has elements of the history of the Jews in Warsaw before the war but it's really a story about truth - truth in regards to yourself and truth in regards to learning what is really important.
Shosa is such a simple and plain girl without any ambition. She is completely unimposing and naïve yet, somehow, against her humble persona you feel that all your `important' troubles are just not that important.
I also like how Singer sets up a love affair that examines the clashing worlds of modern Jewishness: on one side is a progressive liberal intelligencia almost drunk with new ideas while on the other side is an age-old culture that remains immoveable in its ancient wisdom.
Great book that should be read and reread.
... Read more
|