Geometry.Net - Basic_C: Canadian Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. canadian supreme court decisionsare made by people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns.
http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id10.html

Extractions: document.isTrellix = 1; Get Five DVDs for $.49 each. Join now. Tell me when this page is updated Home Canada - US Amalgamation ... HOW TO STOP WESTERN ALIENATION SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CANADIAN PARLIAMENT HOW TO FIX CANADA Francophonie Games The Value of the Canadian Dollar ... SPECIAL-INTEREST GROUPS FEEDBACK numberfour SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. Canadian Supreme Court decisions are made by people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns. In 16 years the Supreme Court struck down 58 statutes 31 federal and 27 provincial according to their private interpretations of the Charter. This appointed-for-life Supreme Court neutered our elected parliaments by changing, canceling or remaking laws made in parliament. These were revolutionary changes homosexual marriages, kiddie porn, definition of spouse, Indians allowed to fish out of season etc. The Supreme Court not the federal government made federal policy. Therefore Canadians were denied democracy and were forced to accept these changes judicial dictatorship.
CANADIAN PARLIAMENT
CANADA IS A JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP The canadian supreme court recently ruled thatCanada cannot extradite people without seeking assurances they will not face
http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id12.html

Extractions: document.isTrellix = 1; Get Five DVDs for $.49 each. Join now. Tell me when this page is updated Home Canada - US Amalgamation ... SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CANADIAN PARLIAMENT HOW TO FIX CANADA Francophonie Games The Value of the Canadian Dollar Ottawa Liberals and Pedophiles ... SPECIAL-INTEREST GROUPS FEEDBACK numberfour CANADIAN PARLIAMENT Prime Minister Chretien could be prime minister for the rest of his life. CANADIANS ARE UP AGAINST IT Canadians in the West know that their votes are almost meaningless in the present parliamentary set up. They can complain from dawn 'till dusk, seven days a week but nothing will change. The percentage of Canadians who even bother vote has steadily declined in recent years. The voters 40% of the 61% who bothered to vote decided and it's all over for another four years or until the prime minister decides. Chretien will also decide when the next election will be called because Canadians do not have a set date for elections. And he may run again because Canadians to not have term limits like the Americans. That is why ex-President Clinton could not run for president again. Chretien has won three elections as prime minister; he may try for three more. What's to stop him? He has a disciplined Liberal majority at his disposal. But it's even worse than that. Canadians as a whole do not elect him as prime minister; it's his fellow Liberals, the talking heads, trained seals and voting machine. There are no free votes in parliament. The Liberals vote as a block. It is not what their constituents want it is what Chretien wants. They owe him total loyalty or he may not sign their nomination papers at the next election or worse he might excommunicate them from the party as he did with Nunziata.
CWNews: New Canadian Supreme Court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance
The story on this page is New canadian supreme court Justice Reveals ProHomosexualStance. New canadian supreme court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance
http://www.cwnews.com/Browse/2002/08/18726.htm

Extractions: New Canadian Supreme Court Justice Reveals Pro-Homosexual Stance OTTAWA, Aug 12, 02 (LSN.ca/CWNews.com) - Newly appointed Canadian Supreme Court Justice Marie Deschamps has revealed she is in favor of special rights for homosexuals. The news comes as a serious blow to pro-family groups who note that the issue of homosexual marriage will undoubtedly reach the courts in the very near future. CBC reports that Deschamps said she's looking forward to dealing with the country's most important issues, including homosexuality. "This is a good example where society has evolved a lot," she said. "Ten years ago, many provinces did not have any law that would (have) recognized the equality of gays." Deschamps, a 49-year-old Quebec judge, is rumored to have been granted the prestigious appointment by Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien due to her husband's close ties to the Quebec Liberal party. The Toronto Star reports that Deschamp's husband Paul Gobeil was a cabinet minister in the government of Robert Bourassa and was also instrumental in Jean Charest's coronation as leader of the Quebec Liberal party in 1998. Currently Gobeil is the head of the Export Development Corporation, a federal crown agency. Canadian Alliance justice critic Vic Toews (Provencher) criticized the autocratic appointment of Supreme Court Justices by the Prime Minister. "I wish her (Deschamps) all the best in a difficult situation, but the danger of a closed process is that people will think she got the job because her husband is a prominent Liberal," he said. So far Chretien has appointed five judges to the Supreme Court.
CWNews: Canadian Supreme Court Judges Blast Christianity
Church. The story on this page is canadian supreme court Judges Blast Christianity. CanadianSupreme Court Judges Blast Christianity OTTAWA
http://www.cwnews.com/Browse/2000/11/14248.htm

Extractions: Canadian Supreme Court Judges Blast Christianity OTTAWA, Nov, 14 (CWNews.com/LSN.ca) - In a court case that could lead to overt legal discrimination against Christians in Canada, two Supreme Court Justices blasted Christianity as discriminatory and intolerant. On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the case of Trinity Western University in which the British Columbia College of Teachers (BCCT) refuses to approve the teacher education program at Trinity Western because the Christian school's code of conduct requires students and teachers to refrain from homosexual sex as well other sinful actions. Two lower court decisions have ordered the BCCT to accredit the university's program, but the Supreme Court suspended those decisions by granting a hearing. During the hearing, Justice Claire L'Heureux-Dube, a feminist activist, was quoted in the National Post as saying, "We have all this love stuff, but if Trinity's code stated that blacks were inferior to whites, or that Jews should be killed, would its teachers still be fit for public schools?" And when the universities defenders said evidence of discrimination must be found among teachers who have graduated from the program, Judge Dube said, "Evidence [of discrimination] is in the [Trinity] program. What kind of other evidence do you want?" Dube is a known homosexual activist, having spoken at homosexual conferences in favor of legal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Canadian Supreme Court Ruling Impacts Personal Liability For Corporate Directors
A recent canadian supreme court ruling, and two subsequent companion appeals, representa significant change in personal liability for corporate directors and
http://www.meritas.org/FSL5CS/news/news391.asp

Extractions: Canadian Supreme Court Ruling Impacts Personal Liability for Corporate Directors, Managers A recent Canadian Supreme Court ruling, and two subsequent companion appeals, represent a significant change in personal liability for corporate directors and senior management. David Debenham, BrazeauSeller (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; www.brazeauseller.com However, ADGA v. Valcom and two recent companion appeals have established a new general principle that directors, officers and senior managers are personally ADGA Doctrine Visit this link
Canadian Supreme Court Allows Some Lap Dancing
Gamelink Buy Movies and Streaming Video HERE! December 13, 1999 0554pm CanadianSupreme Court allows some lap dancing Source Reuters by Randall Palmer
http://ainews.com/story/43/
EMailing The Story "Canadian Supreme Court Rules School Board Wrong To Ban Books
You are emailing the story canadian supreme court rules school board wrongto ban books Who Are You Sending This To? Who Are You? Name Your Name
http://www.lisnews.com/MailStory.php?sid=20030108202135
TIME.com: Canadian Supreme Court -- Dec. 27, 1999
Advanced Search. O T H E R S W H O S H A P E D 1 9 9 9 CanadianSupreme Court By STEPHEN HANDELMAN/OTTAWA. Monday, Dec. 27, 1999
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/intl/article/0,9171,1107991227-37398,00.html

Extractions: The Supreme Court of Canada sits in an austere, gray stone building above the Ottawa River, just down a slight hill from Parliament. But for most of 1999, the controversy swirling around the nine justices, led by Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, might have led an observer unschooled in Ottawa geography to think that the jurists held the higher ground and were steamrolling their vision of the country over the people's elected representatives. In some 60 decisions the court underlined as never before its role as the guardian of Canadian rights and freedoms-and occasionally, according to critics, as the radical interpreter and even inventor of those rights. The Court dominated the national agenda with rulings that extended the definition of secondary picketing, restricted doctor-patient confidentiality and expanded the right to be tried in either official language across the country. It delved into the most intimate aspects of citizens' lives with decisions on divorce and gay rights, and for the first time in its 124-year history, sparked interracial violence with one of its most controversial decisions, on East Coast aboriginal fishing rights. However they applauded or decried specific decisions, legal experts were generally agreed that the Lamer court had launched a new era of juridical activism, inspired by the 1982 Charter of Individual Rights and Freedoms. Chief Justice Lamer himself agrees. "Our decisions hit harder because they hit wider," said Lamer, 66, a former Quebec criminal defense lawyer who has led the court since 1990. Lamer, who is taking early retirement in January, was unapologetic. From his point of view, the issue was not court activism but political passivity. "The kinds of problems we've been getting are issues that 25 years ago went to Members of Parliament" he told TIME. "It's not for me or any judge to decide which laws should be passed, but if legislatures choose not to legislate, where else can people go except the courts?"
ClariNet - All The News You Can Use, Now!
canadian supreme court rejects Harvard bid to patent life form. Thursday,05Dec-2002 1050AM PST, Story from AFP Copyright 2002 by
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/ca/Qcanada-us-genetics.Rmo0_CD5.ht

Extractions: We're sorry, but this news story has expired from our online archives. If you were a ClariNet subscriber, you would have seen this story 10 minutes after it was published: Tell me more about ClariNet Individual News! ClariNet offers newsfeeds that provide compelling news on your website: to attract and retain customers, with a range of products to meet every need and budget. Join the thousands of sites that already use the most desired content on the Web. Tell me more about ClariNet Newsfeeds for my site! Home ... Help/Search
Politech: Canadian Supreme Court Recognizes Free Speech May Be A Good Idea
Politech canadian supreme court recognizes free speech may be a goodidea From Declan McCullagh (declan_at_well.com) Date Feb
http://lists.insecure.org/lists/politech/2002/Feb/0088.html
Politech 2002/02: FC: Canadian Supreme Court Recognizes Free Sp
FC canadian supreme court recognizes free speech may be a good idea. FromDeclan McCullagh (declan@well.com) Date Sat Feb 23 2002 100235 PST.
http://lists.jammed.com/politech/2002/02/0087.html

Extractions: Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 10:02:35 PST Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: ICANN CEO proposes radical changes, more government involvement" Here's a (long) URL to another article on the same topic: -Declan - Forwarded message from owner-politech@politechbot.com - From: "Michael Gurstein" < mgurst@vcn.bc.ca > To: "Politech@Politechbot. Com" < politech@politechbot.com http://www.mccullagh.org/ To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 Sat Feb 23 2002 - 09:03:47 PST
Packing.org, The Concealed Carry Database Canadian Supreme
All of Canada canadian supreme court backs gun control law. Postedon Monday, June 19, 2000 at 0845 AM by msolomon This June 15
http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/1758
Packing.org, The Concealed Carry Database Canadian Supreme
All of Canada canadian supreme court Equivocates on Gun Registry.Posted on Saturday, June 17, 2000 at 0836 AM by spwenger The
http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/1749
Georgetown University Grad School Welcomes Canadian Supreme Court Justice In Tal
georgetown.edu. Georgetown University Grad School Welcomes Canadian SupremeCourt Justice in Talk about Waging War Lawfully WHO Louise
http://communications.georgetown.edu/media_advisories/2003/02/ma03.htm

Extractions: Justice Arbour served as the Chief Prosecutor of War Crimes before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. While at this post, she indicted Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic, the first time a sitting head of state was indicted by an international tribunal. Justice Arbour held earlier appointments on the Supreme Court of Ontario and the Court of Appeal. Arbour's lecture is titled "Waging War Lawfully: Who will enforce the law?" in which she will explore the relationship between international and domestic prosecutions for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Arbour posits that the International Criminal Court may be an entirely successful international judicial institution even if it never hears a case.
Canadian Bishops On Supreme Court Abortion Decision (January 28, 1988)
Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January1988 following the announcement of a canadian supreme court decision on
http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/hayes88-01-28canada.htm

Extractions: Archbishop James Hayes, president of the Canadian conference of Catholic Bishops, issued the following statement on 28 January 1988 following the announcement of a Canadian Supreme Court decision on abortion laws. The Supreme Court decision striking down the abortion law is a dramatic challenge to all lay members of the Church and to all of us their pastors. The need for responsible political action was never more urgent. For God's law condemning abortion is not changed by the Supreme Court decision. In the process of writing a new law that protects human life from conception, lay Christians as voters and legislators have the first responsibility. The situation of "abortion on demand" that follows from the Court's decision must be corrected legislatively as soon as possible. This is our common task now, and the future of our human society depends on how soon and how well it is done. In the process of working for new legislation, all Christians must also apply themselves to the continuing pastoral work of evangelizing modern culture regarding the God-given values and rights of every human life, and the need to safeguard and respect that life in all circumstances. Abortion is the destruction of human life. The challenge is to change our society's attitude towards life and to channel the energies and strong emotions involved in this debate towards correcting mentalities and situations that lead to abortion. We need to create a society that supports life and enables children to be raised with dignity; a society that puts other people's rights and needs ahead of personal comfort and gain; a society that respects human life at every stage of its development.
1713. Canadian Supreme Court. Simpsons Contemporary Quotations. 1988
1988. NUMBER 1713. AUTHOR canadian supreme court. QUOTATION Kneelingto receive Communion is not a criminal offense. ATTRIBUTION
http://www.bartleby.com/63/13/1713.html

Extractions: Select Search All Bartleby.com All Reference Columbia Encyclopedia World History Encyclopedia World Factbook Columbia Gazetteer American Heritage Coll. Dictionary Roget's Thesauri Roget's II: Thesaurus Roget's Int'l Thesaurus Quotations Bartlett's Quotations Columbia Quotations Simpson's Quotations English Usage Modern Usage American English Fowler's King's English Strunk's Style Mencken's Language Cambridge History The King James Bible Oxford Shakespeare Gray's Anatomy Farmer's Cookbook Post's Etiquette Bulfinch's Mythology Frazer's Golden Bough All Verse Anthologies Dickinson, E. Eliot, T.S. Frost, R. Hopkins, G.M. Keats, J. Lawrence, D.H. Masters, E.L. Sandburg, C. Sassoon, S. Whitman, W. Wordsworth, W. Yeats, W.B. All Nonfiction Harvard Classics American Essays Einstein's Relativity Grant, U.S. Roosevelt, T. Wells's History Presidential Inaugurals All Fiction Shelf of Fiction Ghost Stories Short Stories Shaw, G.B. Stein, G. Stevenson, R.L. Wells, H.G. Reference Quotations PREVIOUS NEXT ... BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD NUMBER: AUTHOR: Canadian Supreme Court QUOTATION: Kneeling to receive Communion is not a criminal offense.
Clark University
His examination of the canadian supreme court and the European Union'sCourt of Justice shows they are likewise flexing their muscles.
http://www.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerD.shtml

Extractions: Professor Mark Miller Countries under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Provinces and Territories of Canada. Click to enlarge. European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Canadian Supreme Court building in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Click to enlarge. Photo Supreme Court of Canada. Photographer: Philippe Landreville Photograph Inc. Discover! Courting controversy: the evolving activism of high courts Chads and recounts from last November's election aside, the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the only high court flexing its muscles. For Professor Mark Miller and advisee Dan Bresette '01, following the activities of courts and congresses is a favorite pastime. While Bresette researches Congress's role in foreign policy during the Clinton years, Miller has been attending to the role of high courts in making policy.
Clark University
The question remains, will the European Court of Justice be a unifyingfactor like the US and canadian supreme courts or will it different?
http://www.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerInt.shtml

Extractions: Justice across continents After spending 1999 as a Judicial Fellow for Chief Justice William Rehnquist at the U.S. Supreme Court, government professor Mark Miller knows how the U.S. courts work first-hand. But he is also fascinated by the relationship between the Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress as well as how our court system, overall, compares to others around the world. In a recent interview, Miller discusses his current research in: comparative court systems,
WHAT IS EUTHANASIA
Borowski (1989 canadian supreme court). Tremblay v. Daigle (1987 QuebecCourt of Appeal). Tremblay v. Daigle (1989 canadian supreme court).
http://www.thunderbayrighttolife.com/abortion-homepage.htm

Extractions: ABORTION home page THE ETHICS OF ABORTION Dr.Irving, On Personhood Dr. J.C. Wilke, Abortion: Questions and Answers FETAL DEVELOPMENT (PICTURES ANDTEXT) Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, Human Development from Conception to Birth Sound Wave Images Inc., A Window on the Womb American Collegians for Life, Fetal Development Canadian Pregnacy Counselling, Fetal Development Overview Parents Place.com, First Nine Months Conscience Laws, When Does Human Life Begin? Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Stages of Life - Lennart Nilsson photos Miracle of Life - Lennart Nilsson photos here Nova On-Line, Lifes Greatest Miracle Nova On-Line, Order Form for Lifes Greatest Miracle Pro-Hosting.com, The Journey of an Unborn Child Dr. DeVore, Ultrasound by Dr. De Vore Dr. Woo, Ultrasound by Dr. Joseph Woo Wisconsin Right to Life, Heartbeat on an Unborn Baby- 8 weeks METHODS OF ABORTION National Right to Life, Suction Abortion National Right to Life, The RU-486 Files
WHAT IS EUTHANASIA
Rv Latimer (1995 canadian supreme court). Rv Rodriquez (1997 CanadianSupreme Court). Rv Latimer (1997 canadian supreme court). Rv
http://www.thunderbayrighttolife.com/euthanasia-homepage.htm

Extractions: EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE home page THE ETHICS OF EUTHANASIA Robert Sutherland, The Ethics of Euthanasia 01. Introduction 02. The Definition of Euthanasia 03. The Law on Euthanasia 04. The Mechanics of Euthanasia 05. The Morality: The Right to Life 06. The Morality: The Right to Liberty 07. Euthanasia Safeguards: Voluntary Request 08. Euthanasia Safeguards: Terminal Illness 09. Euthanasia Safeguards: Unbearable Pain 10. If it were legalized, how many people would die? 11. Recommended books, videos and bookstores EUTHANASIA SAFEGUARDS: VOLUNTARY REQUEST Congressional Testimony of Dr.Herbert Hendrin EUTHANASIA SAFEGUARDS: UNBEARABLE PAIN Congressional Testimony of Dr. Kathleen Foley Power over Pain: How to Get the Pain Control You Need THE MECHANICS OF EUTHANASIA Kevorkians Suicide Machine - click on Assisted Suicide Methods Royal Dutch Society for the Advancement of Pharmacy, Administration and Compounding of Euthanasic Agents International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force, Euthanasia as Practised in the Netherlands International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

21-40 of 104 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next 20